T-Splines excels at modeling complex organic shapes imported from scan data

The customer AJ Technology, s.r.o. is an industrial and product design firm based in Brno, Czech Republic. www.ajtechnology.cz/design I’m always searching for new technologies that can improve my work, in contrast to my colleague who loves to work with tools he knows well and improve his skills with them. When we got this car mirror job, we decided it was a really good opportunity to have a little competition between him using Rhino only vs. me using Rhino and T-Splines, and there was no doubt about the winner. My colleague gave up after I finished my model, while he was far from finishing his. —David Jurda, AJ Technology, s.r.o.

The challenge

David has been modeling 3D objects with Rhino3D since 1999. Nowadays, he leads the P&D Studio division at AJ Technology s.r.o., which specializes in industrial and product design. They closely cooperate with a company that works in the car-tuning industry (modifying a car to improve performance and style), and the complexity of shapes in this area led to the use of T-Splines.

In general, modeling in the car-tuning industry is 80% reverse engineering and 20% creative work based on sketches, photos and STL scans of styled car body parts. It is important both to stay within tolerance (approximately +-0.1mm of the original part) and to keep perfect curvature and smoothness of modeled surfaces.

In many cases it is possible to use standard Rhino tools to get the required shapes. However, we often encounter organic shapes that are difficult to model and where every change of shape takes several hours to remodel. These are cases where T-Splines excels.

The solution: T-Splines

We had already worked on a similar task using standard Rhino tools and we knew that this would be a sophisticated model where maintaining the geometry while staying in the requested tolerance would be challenging. So we looked for an alternative method to improve the process of modeling of these organic shapes and T-Splines turned out to be a good choice for a number of reasons:

• The time of modeling with T-Splines was significantly less than that of modeling only with Rhino tools.
• Working with the whole model as a single surface in T-Splines was a great asset compared to the need to smoothly connect a pattern of smaller surfaces in Rhino alone. Geometry changes took minutes instead of hours.
• NURBS surfaces were easily generated from T-Splines at the end of the process without any loss of surface quality, curvature continuity or smoothness.

The process

1. A standard car mirror with some clay modifications was the object of modeling, and was scanned into the computer.

2. Basic surfaces were created around the .stl file by outlining the mesh with a line segment cage (placed by visual control), which was used to generate a T-Splines surface.

3. Here is the basic model after the T-Splines surface was generated.

4. The lower part of mirror was created through the same procedure as above, and was adjusted using the Rhino Point Deviation command.

5. Both parts of the surface were connected and adjusted to match the .stl mesh. During the adjustment, the surfaces kept their curvature and smoothness. The upper and lower parts of the mirror were then combined to create a single T-Splines surface.

6. The surface was converted to NURBS. Some additional geometry was created with standard Rhino tools.

7. The finished model.

8. The rendered model. (The client asked that the manufactured model not be publicly displayed.)

Learn more